Farin, sorry you get my implications above wrong.
The deposits remain the same for all developers. I actually meant that a certain project to be undertaken by some bad developers will be under the purview of respective authorities.
Not specifically on the brand, but the image of the developer of the project.
There are a lot of developers whom has subsidiary companies on its respective projects. Equally a lot of projects under the category of \"sakit\" ie. sick project of which these developers are unable to deliver on its progress stage, or have abandon its project halfway, or be undertaken by another 3rd party company that resulted in delays, or also due to financial constraints. Of course these developers if were to undertake another project, will be subjected to the purview of the respective authorities.
Hope it answers your question
Btw,some developers may have good branding, but its subsidiaries may not be. You may review \"Senarai Pemaju Yang Disenarai Hitam\" at KPKT website. You be amazed to see big branded developers. Of course, those are their subsidiaries.